• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:

    公开号:NL2003696A
    申请号:NL2003696
    申请日:2009-10-22
    公开日:2010-05-11
    发明作者:Yu Cao；Jun Ye；Stefan Hunsche；Jim Koonmen
    申请人:Brion Tech Inc；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    SCANNER MODEL REPRESENTATION WITH TRANSMISSION CROSS
    COEFFICIENTS
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
    The present application claims priority to U.S. Patent Appln. No. 61 / 112,913, filed November 10, 2008, the contents of which are included by reference in their entirety.
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
    The present invention relates to a method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process.
    BACKGROUND OF THE RELATED ART
    Lithographic apparatuses can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In such a case, the mask may contain a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the IC, and this pattern can be imaged onto a target portion on a substrate (silicon wafer) that has been coated with a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). In general, a single wafer will contain a whole network of adjacent target portions that are successively irradiated through the projection system, one at a time. In one type of lithographic projection apparatus, each target portion is irradiated by exposing the entire mask pattern onto the target portion in one go; Such an apparatus is commonly referred to as a wafer stepper. In an alternative apparatus, commonly referred to as a step-and-scan apparatus, each target portion is irradiated by progressively scanning the mask pattern under the projection beam in a given reference direction (the "scanning" direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate table parallel or anti-parallel to this direction. Since, in general, the projection system will have a magnification factor M (generally <1), the speed V at which the substrate table is scanned will be a factor M times that at which the mask table is scanned. More information with regard to lithographic devices as described can be accepted, for example, from US 6,046,792, incorporated by reference.
    [0004] In a manufacturing process using a lithographic projection apparatus, a mask pattern is imaged onto a substrate that is at least partially covered by a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). Prior to this imaging step, the substrate may undergo various procedures, such as priming, resist coating and a soft bake. After exposure, the substrate may be subject to other procedures, such as a post-exposure bake (PEB), development, a hard bake and measurement / inspection of the imaged features. This array of procedures is used as a basis to pattern an individual layer or a device, e.g., an IC. Such a patterned layer may then undergo various processes such as etching, ion implantation (doping), metallization, oxidation, chemo-mechanical polishing, etc., all intended to finish off an individual layer. If several layers are required, then the whole procedure, or a variant of that, will have to be repeated for each new layer. Eventually, an array of devices will be present on the substrate (wafer). These devices are then separated from one another by a technique such as dicing or sawing, whence the individual devices can be mounted on a carrier, connected to pins, etc.
    For the sake of simplicity, the projection system may be referred to as the "lens"; however, this term should be broadly interpreted and compassing various types of projection systems, including refractive optics, reflective optics, and catadioptric systems, for example. The radiation system may also include components operating according to any of these design types for directing, shaping or controlling the projection beam of radiation, and such components may also be referred to below, collectively or singularly, as a "lens". Further, the lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two or more substrate tables (and / or two or more mask tables). In such "multiple stage" devices the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps, maybe carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposures. Twin stage lithographic apparatus are described, for example, in US 5,969,441, incorporated by reference.
    The photolithographic masks referred to above include geometric patterns corresponding to the circuit components to be integrated onto a silicon wafer. The patterns used to create such masks are generated utilizing CAD (computer-aided design) programs, this process often being referred to as EDA (electronic design automation). Most CAD programs follow a set of predetermined design rules in order to create functional masks. These rales are set by processing and design limitations. For example, design rales define the space tolerance between circuit devices (such as gates, capacitors, etc.) or interconnect lines, so as to ensure that the circuit devices or lines do not interact with one in an undesirable way. The design rule limitations are typically referred to as "critical dimensions" (CD). A critical dimension of a circuit can be defined as the smallest width of a line or hole or the smallest space between two lines or two holes.
    Thus, the CD according to the overall size and density of the designed circuit. Whether course, one of the goals in integrated circuit fabrication is to faithfully reproduce the original circuit design on the wafer (via the mask).
    As noted, microlithography is a central step in the manufacturing of semiconductor integrated circuits, where patterns formed on semiconductor wafer substrates define the functional elements of semiconductor devices, such as microprocessors, memory chips, etc. Similar lithographic techniques are also used in the formation of flat panel displays, micro-electro mechanical systems (MEMS) and other devices.
    [0008] As semiconductor manufacturing processes continue to advance, the dimensions of circuit elements are continually reduced while the amount of functional elements, such as transistors, per device has been steadily increasing over decades, following a trend commonly referred to as' Moore's law ". At the current state of technology, critical layers or leading-edge devices are manufactured using optical lithographic projection systems known as scanners that project a mask image onto a substrate using illumination from a deep-ultraviolet laser light source, creating individual circuit features having dimensions well below lOOnm, ie less than half the wavelength of the projection light.
    This process in which features with dimensions narrower than the classical resolution limit of an optical projection system are printed, is commonly known as low-ki lithography, according to the resolution formula CD = k x /./NA. where λ is the wavelength of radiation employed (currently in most cases 248nm or 193nm), NA is the numerical aperture of projection optics, CD is the 'critical dimension' -generally the smallest feature size printed- and k is an empirical resolution factor. In general, the narrower k , the more difficult it becomes to reproduce a pattern on the wafer that resembles the shape and dimensions planned by a circuit designer in order to achieve particular electrical functionality and performance. To overcome these difficulties, sophisticated fine-tuning steps are applied to the projection system as well as to the mask design. These include, for example, but not limited to, optimization of NA and optical coherence settings, customized illumination schemes, use of phase shifting masks, optical proximity correction in the mask layout, or other methods generally defined as 'resolution enhancement techniques' (RET ).
    As one important example, optical proximity correction (OPC, sometimes also referred to as 'optical and process correction') addresses the fact that the final size and placement of a printed feature on the wafer will not simply be a function of the size and placement of the corresponding feature on the mask. It is noted that the tenus 'mask' and 'reticle' are utilized interchangeably. For the small feature sizes and high feature densities present on typical circuit designs, the position of a particular edge or a given feature will be influenced to a certain extent by the presence or absence of other adjacent features. These proximity effects arise from minute amounts of light coupled from one feature to another. Similarly, proximity effects may arise from diffusion and other chemical effects during post-exposure bake (PEB), resist development, and etching that generally follow lithographic exposure.
    [0011] In order to ensure that the features are generated on a semiconductor substrate in accordance with the requirements of the given target circuit design, proximity effects need to be predicted utilizing sophisticated numerical models, and corrections or pre-distortions need to be applied to the design of the mask before successful manufacturing or high-end devices becomes possible. The article "Full-Chip Lithography Simulation and Design Analysis - How OPC Is Changing IC Design", C. Spence, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 5751, pp 1-14 (2005) provides an overview of current 'model-based' optical proximity correction processes. In a typical high-end design, almost every feature edge requires some modification in order to achieve printed patterns that come sufficiently close to the target design. These modifications may include shifting or biasing or edge positions or line widths as well as application or 'assist' features that are not intended to print themselves, but will affect the properties of an associated primary feature.
    The application of model-based OPC to a target design requires good process models and considerable computational resources, given the many millions of features typically present in a chip design. However, applying OPC is generally not an 'exact science', but an empirical, iterative process that does not always resolve all possible weaknesses on a layout. Therefore, post-OPC designs, ie mask layouts after application or all pattern modifications by OPC and any other RETs, need to be verified by design inspection, ie intensive lull-chip simulation using calibrated numerical process models, in order to minimize the possibility of design flaws being built into the manufacturing of a mask set. This is driven by the enormous cost of making high-end mask sets, which run in the multi-million dollar range, as well as by the impact on turn-around time by reworking or repairing actual masks once they have been manufactured.
    Both OPC and full-chip RET verification may be based on numerical modeling systems and methods as described, for example in, U.S. Pat. Patent App. No. 10 / 815,573 and an article titled "Optimized Hardware and Software For Fast, Full Chip Simulation", by Y. Cao et al., Proc. SPIE, Vol. 5754,405 (2005).
    The importance of incorporating scanner information into lithographic modeling is recognized as becoming more and more critical for design applications such as OPC (optical proximity correction). To enable this usage, Nikon, for example, distributes scanner information (Stokes vector, Jones pupil, MSD, etc.) via so-called "scanner signature files". See: T. Matsuyama et al., "An intelligent imaging system for ArF scanner," Proc. SPIE Vol. 6924, 69241S (Mar. 12, 2008).
    Scanner data such as Stokes vector and Jones pupil describing aspects of the scanner optics, but need to be interpreted and transformed correctly in order to be used in imaging simulations. Such an interpretation requires detailed descriptions of the data format and conventions used in the representation. To achieve the required accuracy, extra care is needed in the numerical algorithms when incorporating such data. This requires a lot of knowledge transfer between the scanner vendor and the OPC vendor. This process is error prone and continuous improvement or model accuracy.
    Moreover, the scanner data may also contain sensitive information related to the scanner design, such as data regarding optical subsystems (e.g., Jones pupil), which scanner and subsystem vendors consider highly proprietary.
    As OPC and lithographic simulation becomes more complex, there is a need to incorporate models or more and more scanner subsystems, which is constantly in need of calibration and updated. This becomes a serious and burdensome data management problem.
    Moreover, as computational lithography (CL) is becoming an increasingly important component of the semiconductor manufacturing process, while accuracy requirements are constantly getting more stringent, there is generally a strong need to make accurate litho models available to a wide range of entities along the design-to-manufacturing chain. Accurate scanner data and physical models significantly improve the accuracy of the optical part of a CL model, but require in depth understanding of the corresponding subsystem functionality and are therefore not easy to use outside the range or their normally very narrow intended user base. Furthermore, such models or data may not only expose an unnecessary level or detail, but also information that is proprietary and therefore cannot be made widely available. Several key requirements arise from the situation described above: ease of use, encryption or encapsulation or proprietary data, and ease of integration. Ease of integration into a wide range of third party applications at various levels of design data flow in turn requires a certain level of pre-integration to limit the number of date interfaces, allow interface definition with easy-to-use usage protocols for the data presented at the interfaces, and ease of testing or qualification.
    Given the concerns discussed above, the goal of making scanner data available for model accuracy improvement would be inherently futile if it were just a best effort without any means of actually ensuring model quality. Therefore, the present disclosure provides processes that go beyond those of the previously discussed, by embedding the processes into a large part of the current modeling, namely the multiple numerical integrations to calculate the TCCs. Various algorithms, including more complex and / or proprietary algorithms, that efficiently and with sufficient accuracy apply the TCCs for aerial image simulation are contemplated for the present disclosure. Not only are scanner data being protected, but also the proprietary TCC generation algorithms with VSP. As a result, the usage and possible integration into 3rd party tools becomes very easy, as does qualification / acceptance testing and guaranteeing consistent results across the industry. This overcomes the possibility that as soon as different TCC generation algorithms are applied to the same scanner data, the results would be immediately guaranteed to be different, making wide spread application quite unmanageable.
    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
    According to an aspect of the invention there is provided a method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process, including securing data regarding characteristics of a lithographic apparatus, generating mathematical models representing the secured data, and providing the mathematical models to a simulation process while keeping the secured data hidden to the simulation process. According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process, including generating a model for simulating the aspects of the lithographic process, inserting information about a variety of aspects of the lithographic process to the model, using the model to transform the information into transformed information with a transformation of which the inverse is indeterminate given the transformed information only, the model allows to receive the simulated aspects based on the transformed information and further information about other aspects of the lithographic process.
    The aspect of the invention allows proper separation of concerns between the scanner vendor and the OPC vendor. All the details of scanner optics remain as knowledge and responsibility of the scanner vendor, without compromising the application or such data in OPC-type products. The encapsulation is achieved through a well-defined mathematical transform, i.e., the TCC calculation algorithm. Basic optical information such as illuminator shape and polarization, Jones pupil, focus blur due to laser bandwidth and / or chromatic aberrations, Jones pupil, etc., can easily be incorporated into the TCCs. Field-dependent effects such as through-slit variations can be captured by providing multiple TCCs, one for each field or slit position.
    Imaging simulation can then be performed by convolving the mask patterns with the TCC eigenvectors. The imaging simulation will enable the accuracy advantage or using scanner data in RET type or applications such as OPC and OPC verification. With the addition of predictive scanner models such as pupil predictor, it will also enable process design applications such as SMO (source-mask optimization) and model-based scanner tuning. The invention thus helps protect sensitive information related to a scanner design, while at the same time enabling access to scanner data for the purpose of imaging simulations. Moreover, it helps contain the communication related to such data, including the descriptions, conventions, interpretations, and validations, within the manufacturer of the scanner. Further, it helps the proliferation of scanner data beyond products that exclusively use a particular type of scanner product.
    Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of the invention in the manufacture of ICs, it should be explicitly understood that the invention has many other possible applications. For example, it may be employed in the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, liquid-crystal display panels, thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms "reticle", "wafer" or "that" in this text should be considered as being replaced by the more general terms "mask", "substrate" and "target portion", respectively.
    In the present document, the terms "radiation" and "beam" are used to encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet radiation (eg with a wavelength of 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm) and EUV ( extreme ultra-violet radiation, eg having a wavelength in the range 5-20 nm).
    The tenn mask as employed in this text may be broadly interpreted as referring to generic patterning means that can be used to endow an incoming radiation beam with a patterned cross-section, corresponding to a pattern that has been created in a target portion of the substrate; the term "light valve" can also be used in this context. Besides the classic mask (transmissive or reflective; binary, phase-shifting, hybrid, etc.), examples of other such patterning means include: • a programmable mirror array. An example of such a device is a matrix-addressable surface having a viscoelastic control layer and a reflective surface. The basic principle behind such an apparatus is that (for example) addressed areas of the reflective surface reflect incident light as diffracted light, whereas unaddressed areas reflect incident light as undiffracted light. Using an appropriate filter, the said undiffracted light can be filtered out of the reflected beam, leaving only the diffracted light behind; in this manner, the beam becomes patterned according to the addressing pattern or the matrix-addressable surface. The required matrix addressing can be performed using suitable electronic means. More information on such mirror arrays can be glazed, for example, from United States Patent Nos. 5,296,891 and 5,523,193, which are incorporated by reference. • a programmable LCD array. An example of such a construction is given in United States Patent No. 5,229,872, which is incorporated by reference.
    The invention itself, together with further objects and advantages, can be better understood by reference to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
    LETTER THE SCR FT ION OF THE DRAWINGS
    Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which: [0027] Figure 1 is an exemplary block diagram illustrating a typical lithographic projection system.
    Figure 2 is an exemplary block diagram illustrating the functional modules of a lithographic simulation model.
    Figures 3A and 3B shows a graphical illustration of the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs).
    Figure 4 shows another graphic representation of the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs).
    Figure 5 shows a process flow for individual model generation and model use in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
    Figure 6 shows a process flow for a lithographic model calibration in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
    Figure 7 shows a process flow for a lithographic process optimization in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
    Figure 8 shows a process flow for optical proximity correction using the transmission cross coefficient data file from Figure 6 in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
    Figure 9 shows a process flow for source and mask co-optimization (SMO) in accordance with an aspect of the invention.
    Figure 10 is a block diagram illustrating a computer system that can assist in the implementation of the simulation method of the present invention.
    Figure 11 schematically depicts a lithographic projection apparatus suitable for use with the method of the present invention.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
    Prior to discussing the present invention, a letter discussing the overall simulation and imaging process is provided. Figure 1 illustrates an exemplary lithographic projection system 10. The major components are a light source 12, which may be a deep-ultraviolet excimer laser source, illumination optics which define the partial coherence (denoted as sigma) and which may include specific source shaping optics 14, 16a and 16b; a mask or reticle 18; and projection optics 16c that produce an image of the reticle pattern on the wafer plane 22. An adjustable filter or aperture 20 at the pupil plane may restrict the range of beam angles that impinge on the wafer plane 22, where the largest possible angle defines the numerical aperture of the projection optics NA = sin (0max).
    In a lithography simulation system, these major system components can be described by separate functional modules, for example, as illustrated in Figure 2. Referring to Figure 2, the functional modules include the design layout module 26, which defines the target design ; the mask layout module 28, which defines the mask to be utilized in the imaging process; the mask model module 30, which defines the model of the mask layout to be utilized during the simulation process; the optical model module 32, which defines the performance of the optical components or lithography system; and the resist model module 34, which defines the performance of the resist being utilized in the given process. As is known, the result of the simulation process produces, for example, predicted contours and CDs in the result module 36.
    [0040] More specifically, it is noted that the properties of the illumination and projection optics are captured in the optical model. 32 that includes, but not limited to, NA sigma (σ) settings as well as any particular illumination source shape (eg off-axis light sources such as annular, quadrupole, and dipole, etc.). The optical properties of the photo-resist layer coated on a substrate - ie refractive index, film thickness, propagation and polarization effects - may also be captured as part of the optical model 32. The mask model 30 captures the design features of the reticle and may also include a representation of detailed physical properties of the mask, as described, for example, in WO 2007/030704. Finally, the resist model 34 describes the effects of chemical processes which occur during resist exposure, PEB and development, in order to predict, for example, contours of resist features formed on the substrate wafer. The objective of simulation is to accurately predicted, for example, edge placements and CDs, which can then be compared against the target design. The target design is generally defined as the pre-OPC mask layout, and will be provided in a standardized digital file format such as GDSII or OASIS.
    In one aspect of the invention, a software module (also referred to as a "virtual scanner pack") is configured to compute transmission cross coefficients (TCCs) from a scanner data file. The scanner data file is typically distributed in a scanner signature file or a scanner systematic signature file, which includes information such as an illuminator pupil-fill or a scanner illumination intensity distribution, a polarization, lens aberration and lens apodization. These scanner systematic signatures may vary noticeably between imaging tool generation / families (i.e., NA 0.92 vs. NA 1.3 scanner generations), and also among scanner vendors. However, signatures of the same type from one manufacturer will strongly resemble each other. Therefore, averaging the measured systematic signatures across multiple tools or the same scanner type will typically provide that scanner type's systematic signature.
    Alternatively, machine-type specific performance data or scanner subsystems, eg laser beam delivery systems, illuminator optics, diffractive optical elements (DOEs) and projection lens may be determined from rigorous models of these subsystems and then incorporated into a general process or OPC model. This approach may provide greater flexibility for the models to predict tool performance over a wide range of operating conditions, where optical settings such as NA, sigma, and illumination mode may be optimized to improve overall process performance.
    The combined information included in the scanner signature fdes plus process specific parameter settings can be described using transmission cross coefficients (TCCs). A mathematical formulation of the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs) is now provided. In the below scalar model formation, the following notation will be used: x = (x, y) spatial coordinate; k = (kx, / <;..) spatial frequency; fi '(k) = S (kx, ky) source intensity distribution P (kf) = P (kx, kv) pupil amplitude; M (k) = M (kx, ky) Fourier transform of the mask; and f (x) = I (x, y) aerial image intensity.
    When the illumination is coherent with a point source on the optical axis, we have
    (1) When the illumination is coherent, but the source point is at ko (off-axis), the mask transmission is subject to a phase modulation cxp (/ ko x). The Fourier transform or this phase modulation is b (k - ko). So the Fourier transform or mask with off-axis point source modulation is the convolution between Λ / (k) and r) (k - ko), which is equal to M (k - ko). So the aerial image intensity is
    (2) In the case of partial coherence using the Abbe Formulation, the source points are mutually inconsistent, thus, their contributions to the aerial image add up in intensity
    (3) In the case of partial coherence using the Hopkins Formulation, a simple mathematical rear arrangement or Eq. ((3)) gives (4)
    10048] The last step involves a change of notation, k'-k -> k ', k "- k -► k". This results in the definition of the transmission cross coefficients, or TCC
    (5) which is solely dependent on the optical system, and not on mask patterns or a pattern on a patterning means such a mask or reticle. So we have
    (6)
    For the case of partial coherence, the TCC Decomposition can be determined. From Eq. ((5)), it is apparent that the TCC is a Hermitian matrix, which can be diagonalized and turned into an own-series expansion, (7) where A; are the eigenvalues (real), and V, are the eigenvectors (complex). Substituting the above into Eq. ((6)), we get (8) The eigenenseries expansion in Eq. (8) is typically truncated to reduce the amount of computation. The truncation is usually done according to the magnitude of the eigenvalues. The more terms kept in the owner's series, the better accuracy retained, at the cost of more computation.
    For the case of defocus, a phase map on the pupil, which is calculated from the optical path differences between different incidence angles on the wafer side, captures the defocus effect.
    The non-paraxial scalar model having high NA effects introducing an obliquity factor on the pupil function (amplitude) for the purpose of enforcing energy conservation, following [3], The obliquity factor depends on the wave vector angle and involves the magnification factor (typically 0.25 for lithography systems) for solid angle calculations.
    Pupil aberration may be specified using Zemike coefficients. The Fringe Code convention is used, as would be apparent.
    A vector model that includes vector diffraction and source polarization can be developed based on the formulation above. Following [4], the diffracted amplitude is calculated as a function of source side wave vector (k) and polarization (Ex, Ey), and exit pupil wave vector (k ') and polarization (TE, TM). In this case, the polarization from the z component (Ez) can be ignored since Ez is negligible due to the small source side numerical aperture.
    Wafer side film stack and polarization effects can also be determined. Following [5], we can compute the electric field intensity (| E |) distribution in the resist film. This step converts the exit pupil wave vector (k ') and polarization (TE, TM) into image side polarization (Ex, Ey <Ez), from which the field intensity is derived.
    Vector pupil filter and aberration effects can also be determined. A user-defined vector pupil filter map over the pupil coordinates may be specified. Each element of the pupil filter map is a complex-valued matrix, loosely known as a Jones matrix. This matrix describes the amplitude change, phase change, and rotation of the polarization vectors. An important difference from the conventional Jones matrix concept is that the 2 x 2 matrix for a given pupil position does not have to be Hermitian, as is the case for physical polarizing devices. Hermiticity is enforced at a higher level, via the bilinear TCC matrix.
    In the case of immersion, both the vector diffraction and film stack calculations are modified to accommodate free space medium with n> 1.
    In the case of mask 3D effects, rigorous finite difference time domain (cf. [6]) simulation maybe used to account for the mask's topography scattering effect to the EM wave.
    In the case of model apply flow, both the mask and aerial image are represented as sampled image pixel values. There are some important differences between the two. First of all, in tenus or mask rasterization, the mask causes an amplitude modulation to the incidence light wave. The physical mask has sharp edges, and the first-level mathematical representation is polygons with different transmittance and phase.
    The polygons are converted to a high-resolution image then down-sampled (with anti-aliasing filtering) to the primary pixel size. The transmission and phase are applied to the high-resolution image. The final mask image at the primary pixel size is a complex-valued image. In practice, binary and phase shift masks with only 0 and π phase shift can be represented using real values.
    Second, in terms of aerial image computing, the physical quantity represented by an aerial image is course intensity rather than amplitude. For this reason, the aerial image is real instead of complex. The aerial image is also intrinsically band-limited, unlike the mask.
    To apply a term TCC to a mask image, one forward Fourier transform (using FFT) and one backward Fourier transforms are required. The results of the backward Fourier transforms are squared and summed, to give the final aerial image intensity.
    Sampling and interpolation can also be performed. From Eq. ((4)), we see the pass band or the aerial image is determined entirely by the pupil function, and is not related to the source shape. The pass band is at 2ΝΑ / λ, with the factor of 2 coming from the conversion from amplitude to intensity. It is also easy to see by considering a simple case or two-beam interference at angles ± NA.
    An interesting point arises if we consider the pass band or the aerial image computed from the decomposed TCC or convolution kernels approach. From Eq. (5), the TCC has support in both k 'and A "up to (1 + σ) /Α / λ, so one would expect the eigenvectors to have support up to (1 + σ) ΝΑ / λ as well (which is true). Then from Eq. (8), the pass band of the result of the sum should be 2 (1 + σ) ΝΑ / λ, not 2ΝΑ / λ from the physical (and Abbe) considerations. diminishes as more terms are kept in summation, as the extraneous frequency components from different kernels cancel each other better This pass-band discrepancy gives an intuitive way to understand why more kernels are required for higher σ values, as exact cancellation of the high frequency components becomes more difficult It also suggests another benefit or keeping more convolution kernels after the TCC diagonalization.
    The critical sampling frequency required by the aerial image is 4NA / X, being twice the aerial image pass band (Shannon sampling theorem). Typically, a 20% to 30% extra frequency margin (oversampling) is used on top of the critical frequency to ensure good interpolation accuracy. The inverse of the final aerial image sampling frequency gives the aerial image pixel size, also called the primary pixel size. As an example, at λ = 193 nm, NA = 0.85, the critical sampling frequency is equal to λ / (4ΝΑ) = 56.76nm. In reality, 40nm is probably the suitable aerial image pixel size.
    After the forward FFT is carried out, the TCC eigenvectors are multiplied by the mask spectrum. The high frequency components may be zero-padded, such that the result of the backward Fourier transform (aerial image) becomes more densely sampled. The aerial image may also be interpolated using filters in the space domain.
    The Hopkins' method, as discussed above, is based on the exchange of the integration order over the point source contributions and the diffraction amplitudes, which has the advantage of a given optical system with fixed illumination, numerical aperture, defocus, and other aberrations can be described with the so-called transmission cross coefficients (TCCs). The TCCs need to be calculated just once. Thereafter they can be reused for repeated aerial image simulations or different mask patterns printed by the same optical system.
    Modeling the aerial imaging path through the projected optics and under the designed illumination scheme will now be discussed. The physical imaging model has been well established in optical science, either scalar or vector imaging model may be used. Vector model is becoming more important as optical lithography moves to high-NA systems (high NA generally refers to NA larger than 0.6). Over the past decade, there have been various techniques developed to speed up the computation.
    One example is to decompose the total imaging system into a series of coherent imaging systems with decreasing importance, ie, narrower and narrower eigenvalues or a matrix called Transmission Cross Coefficients (TCCs) which is a matrix defined by the projection and illumination optics. but independent of the mask pattern itself. The decomposed coherent systems are often called as eigen-systems. Depending on the accuracy requirement, various numbers or own systems can be included. The majority of the aerial image computations may employ Fast Fourier Transforms (FFTs), both forward and backward, to generate the aerial image. Because a diffraction-limited coherent optical imaging system may be readily available as a series of
    Fourier Tansforms, it may be advantageous to employ FFTs to generate the aerial image of the design. All these transforms, when applied to pixel-based image, may be regular pixel-based computations.
    Further, the aerial image may be generated by using, for example, the bitmap image of a polygon design database as modified by additional processing (for example, anti-aliasing filtering techniques and / or mask error modeling).
    During the aerial image generation / computation, the wafer-surface resist stack parameters (for example, thickness, BARC and / or refractive index) may be incorporated into the TCC equations. Various non-mask RET technologies may also be incorporated, for example, the off-axis illumination and pupil filtering, as part of the TCC computation equations. Further, the imperfections in optics, for example, aberration and / or light scattering, may also be incorporated in the aerial imaging equations, by accordingly modifying the pupil filtering from ideal case. Moreover, basic optical information such as illuminator shape and polarization, Numeric aperture, Jones pupil, focus blur (for instance due to laser bandwidth or / and chromatic aberrations) and the focus can be easily incorporated into the transmission cross coefficients. Further, field-dependent effects such as through-slit variations can be captured by providing multiple TCCs, one for each field or slit position. Thus the transmission cross coefficients can be based on the combination of various kinds of characteristics of the lithographic process.
    The software module of the present invention computes the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs) from scanner data. The scanner data includes information related to the arrangement and configuration of the optical systems or the lithographic apparatus that will be hidden from the final user. The details of the optical systems will remain protected, while at the same time, enabling access to scanner data for the purpose of imaging simulations. This process helps maintain information related to scanner data including descriptions, conventions, interpretations and validations confidential to only the scanner designer. The transmission cross coefficients (TCCs) are a mathematical entity that encapsulates all the details of the scanner data (optics), and form a transfer function for the optical system which enables imaging simulations. Note that the TCCs are calculated based on a summation about different values of the spatial frequency k or a product of 3 terms (the source intensity distribution S (k) and the pupil amplitude P (k ') (see equation 5). none of these terms to another party (the final user), one effectively conceals these terms (the source intensity distribution S (k) and the pupil amplitude P (k ')) for the other party, as that party will not be able to extract the source intensity distribution S (k) and the pupil amplitude P (k ') by reversing the calculation There is simply a lack of information to do that in other words the equations to solve to obtain the tenus (source intensity distribution S (k) and the pupil amplitude P (k ')) from the TCCs (equation 5) or their own vectors and eigenvalues (equation 7.) Still the other party (the final user) is still able to calculate the intensity based on the TCCs (equation 6) ortheir eigenvalues and own vectors (equation 8) when combined with in formation on the mask. Thus the invention makes use of the separation in the model between two sets of information being the information expressed in transformed form by the TCCs (such as illuminator shape, illuminator polarization, Jones pupil and focus blur (caused by laser bandwidth and / or chromatic aberration or a projections system) and further information such as on the layout of a pattern on a patterning means The result of the transformation is independent of the further information The transformed information and the further information (as said for instance on the layout of the pattern on the patterning means can be combined in a later step by another party (the final user) Note that the final user also does not have to provide information on the layout of the pattern on the pattering means (the further information) to the party performing the transformation (typically the party that wants to conceal other information on the process such as information on a photolithographic apparatus) in order r that the simulation can be completed. Typically such information is highly secret as well. Apart from that, exchanging information on the layout of a pattern on a patterning requires a large transmission time (as such information is typically quite extensive) and the final user (ie the party with the information on the layout of a pattern on a patterning means) keeps control over the time required for the final steps in the simulation as he performs them himself. However, the further information comprises an illuminator setting (such as a sigma) and the transformation depends on the further information. In this edition of course a part of the information of the final user is a share with the party performing the transformation. However, still the information can be sealed from the final user by only providing the transferred information to the final user. The simulation is then complete by combining the transformed information with further information or at least a part of the further combination.
    A graphical illustration of the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs) are shown in Figures 3A and 3B. Figure 3A shows a view of the interaction or a single incidence beam as it passes through various components or a simplified patterning structure or a lithographic apparatus. A single incidence beam 300 is directed onto a simple mask 305. The mask 305 in this case is a diffraction grating. The mask 305 diffracts the incidence beam 300 into a variety of diffraction orders 310. The first two orders of diffraction (± 1, ± 2) are shown for simplicity. The zeroth order (undiffractive) is not shown. Optical elements, such as lens 315 and 320 capture the diffracted radiation and focus the radiation having the mask pattern formed in its cross-section to create an aerial image 325. The amount of diffractive orders captured by the lens 320 is determined, in part, by the numeric aperture of the lens.
    Figure 3B differs from Figure 3A by showing a more realistic interaction or incident radiation through various components or a patterning structure or a lithographic apparatus. Multiple incident beams 330 from a variety of incident angles are directed onto a mask 335. The mask 335 is a complex mask that has undergone post optical proximity correction (post-OPC). A complex diffraction pattern 340 was then created by virtue of the incident beams interacting with the mask 335. Optical elements, such as lens 350 capture the diffracted radiation, where many 2-beam interactions contribute to produce the aerial image 355.
    A transmission cross coefficient (TCC) matrix sums up all the mutual 2-beam interactions originating from an extended source, as in Figure 3B, to form the aerial image. The terms of the TCC matrix contain all information of the source map and the projection optics, while being independent of the mask pattern. The TCC matrix is pre-computed when a model is generated, so the integration over all source points is already done when the model is applied to a specific mask. This allows fast full-chip lithographic simulation.
    Figure 4 shows another graphic representation of the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs). The TCCs are decomposed into Eigenfunctions®, i.e., a set of pupil functions with different distribution symmetry and different weight. As shown, Eigenfunctions <E> i, Φ2, Φ3 and Φ4 represent pupil functions in a frequency domain. A Fourier transform, in real space, or the Eigenfunctions ΦΜ results in a corresponding convolution kemel cpm. In the case of a set of four Eigenfunctions (Φι, Φ2, Φ3 and Φ4), a corresponding set of four convolution kernels (cpi, (p2, (p3 and qn) represent the mask image in the spatial domain. The aerial image results from convolution of the mask image with the weighted sum of the kemels cpm The weights are determined by the own values and the mask (see equation) Although only four Eigenfunctions are shown in Figure 4, several boxes or several hundred Eigenvectors are used in preferred variants for practical situations, chosen as described below.
    In an aspect of the invention, the software module calculates the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs) according to the following manner. The illuminator pupil based on the intensity distribution, 5 (k), and the projection pupil function (finite numeric aperture (NA), Jones pupil, aberrations, etc.) based on the pupil amplitude are both rasterized and sampled. A numeric integration or Eq. ((5)) is performed to determine the TCC matrix elements. An Eigenvalue decomposition according to Eq. ((8)) is performed and a select number (N) dominant Eigenvectors, having the largest Eigenvalues, is chosen. The selected dominant Eigenvectors are then output to a file, such as an XML file format.
    In one aspect of the invention, the software module is configured to compute the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs) based on an automated Diffractive Optical Element (DOE) exchanger. This DOE exchanger allows users to select from a library of standard illumination shapes, which can increase their depth of focus and exposure while reducing mask error factors for the most advanced layers of integrated circuits. The standard illumination shapes include on-axis and off-axis light sources such as annular, quadrupole (i.e., quasar) and dipole arrangements.
    Figure 5 shows a process flow for individual model generation and model use in accordance with an aspect of the invention. The process starts at 500 where a user inputs data into a computer through a computer interface, such as a graphic user interface. The inputs include process setup parameters such as numeric aperture, sigma settings, diffractive optical element selection, film stack, scanner type and specific scanner data. The process continues at 505 where virtual scanner pack software module operating on the computer is used to generate a set of transmission cross coefficient kernels (further described below in reference to Figure 6). The process continues at 510 where the generated transmission cross coefficient kernels are arranged in a transmission coefficient data file. A simulation module operating on the computer is configured to receive the transmission coefficient data file and a mask data file, which could be generated separately, at 515. The simulation module, at 520, proceeds to perform an optical simulation using the transmission coefficient data file and the mask data file by performing a convolution operation of the mask pattern with the generated transmission cross coefficients. The process continues at 525 where the results of the convolution operation is an aerial image data. The aerial image data is combined with a resist model simulation at 530 to simulate a predicted wafer contours and critical dimensions, at 535.
    Figure 6 shows a process flow for a lithographic model calibration in accordance with an aspect of the invention. The process starts at 600 where a process setup parameter file that includes information such as numeric aperture, sigma settings, diffractive optical element selection, film stack and scanner data is generated. Although not shown in the Figure, a simulation tool could be included to determine best parameter values for resist model parameters. The process continues at 605 where the virtual scanner pack software module generates the transmission cross coefficient kernels from the process setup parameter file. The process continues at 610 where the generated transmission cross coefficient kernels are arranged in a transmission coefficient data fie. A simulation module operating on the computer is configured to receive the transmission coefficient data file and a mask data file 630, which could be generated separately, at 615. The process continues at 620 where the predicted critical dimensions generated by the simulation of the simulation module are compared with critical dimension data 635 from a measured wafer. If the comparison results in an insufficient fit, the process proceeds back to the beginning at 600, where the process setup parameter are modified. The modifications can include changes to one or more parameters such as defocus amount and the annular illumination as represented by σιη and aou [. If the comparison between the simulated and measured critical dimensions results in a sufficient fit, then the transmission cross coefficient file outputted or stored for later use at 625.
    Figure 7 shows a process flow for a lithographic process optimization in accordance with an aspect of the invention. The process begins at 700 where a process setup parameter file that includes information such as numeric aperture, sigma settings, diffractive optical element selection, film stack and scanner data is generated. The process continues at 705 where the virtual scanner pack software module generates the transmission cross coefficient kernels from the process setup parameter file. The software module also applies scanner constraints, such as parameter value limits. The process continues at 710 where the generated transmission cross coefficient kernels are arranged in a transmission coefficient data file. A simulation module operating on the computer is configured to receive the transmission coefficient data file and a mask data file, which could be generated separately, at 715. The process continues at 720 where the simulation module performs a simulation based on the input transmission cross coefficient data file and the mask data file. The process continues at 725 where the simulation generates quality metrics. The process quality metrics are based on predicted contours, such as normalized image log slope (NILS), mask error factor (MEF) and process window (PW). Tf the quality metrics are determined to be of an insufficient quality, the process proceeds back to the beginning at 700, where the process setup parameter are modified. The modifications can include changes to one or more parameters such as numerical aperture and the annular illumination as represented by om and Gout - If the quality metrics are determined to be sufficient, then the transmission cross coefficient file is outputted or stored for later use at 730.
    Figure 8 shows a process flow for optical proximity correction using the transmission cross coefficient data file from Figure 6 in accordance with an aspect of the invention. The process starts at 800 where the calibrated transmission cross coefficient data file is provided. A target layout data file and a mask layout data file is provided to an optical proximity correction simulation and correction engine at 805. At 810, contour quality metrics or predicted contours are compared with target layout polygons, such as edge placement error (EPE) statistics . If the comparison results in insufficient convergence, the mask layout is modified at 815 and combined with a target layout data file at 820 to be input into the optical proximity correction simulation and correction engine at 805. If the comparison results in a satisfactory convergence, then the mask layout data file is outputted at 825.
    In another aspect of the invention, the software module configured to compute the transmission cross coefficients (TCCs) based on an automated Diffractive Optical Element (DOE) exchanger and a Source-Mask Optimization (SMO). The SMO co-optimizes the illumination and reticle pattern for a specific design fragment (clip), while obeying the constraints of the DOE and mask fabrication processes. The optimization process uses a given source shape as input for the model based OPC mask revision and then cycles the process until the combination giving the optimum focus exposure condition appears. Optimization metrics include the overlapping process window for multiple clips and mask error enhancement factor (MEEF).
    Figure 9 shows a process flow for source and mask co-optimization (SMO) in accordance with an aspect of the invention. A process setup 1005 is combined with a target source map 1010 and input into a virtual scanner pack software module 1015. The software module 1015 generates transmission cross coefficient (TCC) kernels and applies scanner constraints on parameter value limits and source map rendering. A TCC data file 1020 is output from the software module 1015 and is input to a source mask simulation and optimization (SMO) engine 1030. An actual source folder 1025 is also output from the software module 1015. Quality metrics 1035 are determined from the SMO engine 1015, and if the quality metrics converge, then a mask layout data file is outputted, at 1040. Also, the actual source folder 1025 is outputted. The quality metrics are based on the predicted contours of the target layout data file 1050 and include normalized image log slope (NILS), mask error factor (MEF), and process window (PW). If the quality metrics do not converge, a mask layout and target source map are modified at 1045 and the process repeats at 1010.
    Figure 10 is a block diagram illustrating a computer system 100 which can assist in implementing the lithographic simulation methods disclosed. Computer system 100 includes a bus 102 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a processor 104 coupled with bus 102 for processing information. Computer system 100 also includes a main memory 106, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 102 for failure information and instructions for executed by processor 104. Main memory 106 also may be used for failure temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 104. Computer system 100 further includes a read-only memory (ROM) 108 or other static storage device coupled to bus 102 for failure static information and instructions for processor 104. A storage device 110, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, is provided and coupled to bus 102 for malfunction information and instructions.
    Computer system 100 may be coupled via bus 102 to display 112, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or flat panel or touch panel display for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 114, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 102 for communicating information and command selections to processor 104. Another type of user input device is cursor control 116, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 104 and for controlling cursor movement on display 112. This input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (eg, x) and a second axis (eg, y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane. A touch panel (screen) display may also be used as an input device.
    [0087] According to one embodiment of the invention, portions of the simulation process may be performed by computer system 100 in response to processor 104 executing one or more sequences or one or more instructions contained in main memory 106. Such instructions may be read into main memory 106 from another computer-readable medium, such as storage device 110.
    Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 106 causes processor 104 to perform the process steps described. One or more processors in a multi-processing arrangement may also be employed to execute the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 106. In alternative expired, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place or in combination with software instructions to implement the invention . Thus, the invention or the invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
    The term "computer-readable medium" as used refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to processor 104 for execution. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media include, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as storage device 110. Volatile media include dynamic memory, such as main memory 106. Transmission media include coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that include bus 102. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) data communications. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, DVD, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave as described hereinafter, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
    Various forms of computer readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences or one or more instructions to processor 104 for execution. For example, the instructions may be borne on a magnetic disk or a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions about a telephone line using a modem. A modem local to computer system 100 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infrared transmitter to convert the data to an infrared signal. An infrared detector coupled to bus 102 can receive the data carried in the infrared signal and place the data on bus 102. Bus 102 carries the data to main memory 106, from which processor 104 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 106 may optionally be stored on storage device 110 either before or after execution by processor 104.
    Computer system 100 also preferably includes a communication interface 118 coupled to bus 102. Communication interface 118 provides a two-way data communication link to a network link 120 that is connected to a local network 122. For example, communication interface 118 may be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card or modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. As another example, communication interface 118 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links may also be implemented. In any sucb implementation, communication interface 118 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that cany digital data streams representing various types of information.
    Network link 120 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, network link 120 may provide a connection through local network 122 to a host computer 124 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 126. ISP 126 in turn provides data communication services through the worldwide packet data communication network, now commonly referred to as the "Internet" 128. Local network 122 and Internet 128 both use electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals on network link 120 and through communication interface 118, which carry the digital data to and from computer system 100, are exemplary forms of carrier waves transporting the information.
    Computer system 100 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network (s), network link 120, and communication interface 118. In the Internet example, a server 130 might transmit a requested code for an application program through Internet 128, ISP 126, local netw ork 122 and communication interface 118. In accordance with the invention, one such downloaded application provides for the illumination optimization of the embodiment, for example. The received code may be executed by processor 104 if it is received, and / or stored in storage device 110, or other non-volatile storage for later execution. In this manner, computer system 100 may obtain application code in the form of a carrier wave.
    Figure 11 schematically depicts an exemplary lithographic projection apparatus for which lithographic processing can be simulated utilizing the process of present invention. The apparatus comprises: - a radiation system Ex, IL, for supplying a projection beam PB or radiation. In this particular case, the radiation system also comprises a radiation source LA; - a first object table (mask table) MT provided with a mask holder for bolding a mask MA (e.g., a reticle), and connected to first positioning means for accurately positioning the mask with respect to item PL; - a second object table (substrate table) WT provided with a substrate holder for holding a substrate W (e.g., a resist-coated silicon wafer), and connected to second positioning means for accurately positioning the substrate with respect to item PL; a projection system ("lens") PL (e.g., refractive, catoptric or catadioptric optical system) for imaging an irradiated portion of the mask MA onto a target portion C (e.g., including one or more dies) or the substrate W.
    As depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (/, has a transmissive mask). However, in general, it may also be a reflective type, for example (with a reflective mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may employ another child or patterning means as an alternative to the use of a mask; examples include a programmable mirror array or LCD matrix.
    The source LA (e.g., a mercury lamp or excimer laser) produces a beam of radiation. This beam is fed into an illumination system (illuminator) IL, either directly or after having traversed conditioning means, such as a beam expander Ex, for example. The illuminator IL may include adjusting means AM for setting the outer and / or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) or the intensity distribution in the beam. In addition, it will generally include various other components, such as an integrator, and a condenser CO. In this way, the beam PB impinging on the mask MA has a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
    It should be noted with regard to FIG. 11 that the source LA may be within the housing of the lithographic projection apparatus (as is often the case when the source LA is a mercury lamp, for example), but that may also be remote from the lithographic projection apparatus, the radiation beam that it produces being led into the apparatus (eg, with the aid of suitable directing mirrors); this latter scenario is often the case when the source LA is an excimer laser (e.g., based on KrF, ArF or F2 lasing). The current invention and compasses at least both of these scenarios.
    The beam PBiter intercepts the mask MA, which is a hero on a mask table MT. Having traversed the mask MA, the beam PB passes through the lens PL, which marked the beam PB onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioning means (and interferometric measuring means IF), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, eg so as to position different target portions C in the path of the beam PB. Similarly, the first positioning means can be used to accurately position the mask MA with respect to the path of the beam PB, e.g., after mechanical retrieval of the mask MA from a mask library, or during a scan. In general, movement of the object tables MT, WT will be realized with the aid of a long-stroke module (coarse positioning) and a short-stroke module (fine positioning), which are not explicitly depicted in FIG. 11. FTowever, in the case of a wafer stepper (as opposed to a step-and-scan tool) the mask table MT may just be connected to a short stroke actuator, or may be fixed.
    The depicted tool can be used in two different modes: - In step mode, the mask table MT is kept essentially stationary, and an entire mask image is projected in one go (/. E., A single "flash") onto a target portion C. The substrate table WT is then shifted in the x and / or y directions so that a different target portion C can be irradiated by the beam PB; - In scan mode, essentially the same scenario applies, except that a given target portion C is not exposed in a single "flash". Instead, the mask table MT is movable in a given direction (the so-called "scan direction", e.g., the y direction) with a speed v, so that the projection beam PB is caused to scan over a mask image; concurrently, the substrate table WT is simultaneously moved in the same or opposite direction at a speed V-Mv, in which M is the magnification of the lens PL (typically, M = 1/4 or 1/5). In this manner, a relatively large target portion C can be exposed, without having to compromise on resolution.
    The concepts disclosed may simulate or mathematically model any generic imaging system for imaging sub wavelength features, and may be especially useful with emerging imaging technologies capable of producing wavelengths or an increasingly smaller size.
    Emerging technologies already in use include EUV (extreme ultra violet) lithography that is capable of producing a 193nm wavelength with the use of an ArF laser, and even a 157nm wavelength with the use of a Fluorine laser. Moreover, EUV lithography is capable of producing wavelengths within a range of 20-5nm by using a synchrotron or by hitting a material (either solid or a plasma) with high energy electrons in order to produce photons within this range. Because most materials are absorptive within this range, illumination may be produced by reflective mirrors with a multi-stack of Molybdenum and Silicon. The multi-stack mirror has 40 layer pairs of Molybdenum and Silicon where the thickness of each layer is a quarter wavelength. Even narrower wavelengths may be produced with X-ray lithography. Typically, a synchrotron is used to produce an X-ray wavelength. Since most material is absorptive at x-ray wavelengths, a thin piece of absorbing material defines where features would print (positive resist) or not print (negative resist).
    While the concepts disclosed may be used for imaging on a substrate such as a silicon wafer, it shall be understood that the disclosed concepts may be used for any type of lithographic imaging systems, eg, those used for imaging on substrates other than silicon wafers.
    The descriptions above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Thus, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the invention as described without departing from the scope of the clauses set out below. Several aspects of the invention are described by the following set of clauses. 1 A. A method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process, including: securing data regarding characteristics of a lithographic apparatus; generating mathematical models representing the secured data; and providing the mathematical models to a simulation process while keeping the secured data hidden to the simulation process. 2A. A method according to clause 1, providing the providing step includes: identifying re-determined elements of the mathematical models; and populating a record with values of the generated mathematical models corresponding to the pre-determined elements. 3A. A method according to clause 1, where the record comprises an XML file. 4A. A method according to clause 1, according to the characteristics correspond to one or more subsystems of the lithographic apparatus. 5A. A method according to clause 1, including the characteristics include Jones pupil. 6A. A method according to clause 1, including the characteristics include focus blur. 7A. A method according to clause 1, where the mathematical models include transmission cross-coefficients (TCCs). 8A. A method according to clause 2, the mathematical models include transmission cross-coefficients (TCCs), and the pre-determined elements include TCC eigenvectors. 9A. A method according to clause 1, further including receiving lithographic source information, the mathematical models are generated using the received lithographic source information. 10A. A method according to clause 9, where the lithographic source information is identified from a pre-determined set of source patterns. 11 A. A method according to clause 9, according to the lithographic source information is auser-define target source pattern. 12A. A method according to clause 8, where the TCC eigenvectors are represented as a matrix form in spatial frequencies. 13 A. A method according to clause 8, the mathematical models include a transformation of the TCC eigenvectors into a series of convolution kernels. 14A. A method according to clause 13, according to the series or convolution kernels are represented in a spatial domain. 15 A. A method according to clause 13, the series of convolution kernels represent a sum of coherent system components of the lithography process. 16A. A method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process, including: providing information on one or more optical components, one or more optical properties, or both of a lithographic apparatus; encapsulating the information of the one or more optical components using a transformation function, the transformation function secures the information; providing the encapsulated information to a simulation process to simulate a lithographic process. 1 7A. A method according to clause 16, the transformation function includes computing one or more transmission cross coefficients. 18A. A method according to clause 17, where the computed transmission cross coefficients are applied to a source mask simulation process to determine process quality metrics or predicted contours or a mask layout data file. 19A. A method according to clause 18, the process quality metrics include one or more or normalized image log slope, mask error factor, and process window. 20A. A method according to clause 17 18 or 19, the computered transmission cross coefficients are outputted as an XML file format. 21 A. A method according to clause 17, where the transmission cross coefficients are represented as a set or own functions in a matrix format in spatial frequencies. 22A. A method according to clause 17, where the transformation function includes transforming the transmission cross coefficients into a series of convolution kernels. 23 A. A method according to clause 22, the series of convolution kernels are represented in a spatial domain. 24A. A method according to clause 22 or 26, representing the series of convolution kernels representing a sum of coherent system components or the lithography process. 25 A. A method according to any of the clauses 16 to 24, the information that is secured by the transformation function is unavailable to a user of the simulation process. 26A. A method according to any of the clauses 16 25, the one or more optical components include an illumination system, a projection system or both of the lithographic apparatus. 27 A. A method according to any of the clauses 16 to 26, the one or more optical properties include illuminator shape and polarization, Jones pupil, focus blur due to laser bandwidth, focus blur due to chromatic aberrations. 28A. Method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process, including generating a model for simulating the aspects of the lithographic process; embedding information about a variety of aspects of the lithographic process to the model; using the model to transform the information into transformed information with a transformation of which the inverse is indeterminate given the transformed information only; where the model allows receiving the simulated aspects based on the transformed information and further information about other aspects of the lithographic process. 29A. Method according to clause 28, the various aspects included at least one of illuminator shape, illuminator polarization, Jones pupil and focus blur. 30A. Method according to clause 28 or 29, the further information comprises information on the layout of a pattern on a patterning means. 31 A. Method according to any of the clauses 28 to 30, the simulated aspects include at least one of aerial image intensity, normalized image log slope, mask error factor and process window. 32 A. Method according to any of the clauses 28 to 31, including the transformed information comprises a variety or eigenvectors and eigenvalues or transmission cross coefficients. 33A. Method according to any of the clauses 28 to 32, the transformation is independent of the further information.
    Other aspects of the invention are set out as in the following numbered clauses: 1. Method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process, including: securing data regarding characteristics of a lithographic apparatus; generating mathematical models representing the secured data; and providing the mathematical models to a simulation process while keeping the secured data hidden to the simulation process. 2. Method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process, including: providing information on one or more optical components, one or more optical properties, or both of a lithographic apparatus; encapsulating the information of the one or more optical components using a transformation function, the transformation function secures the information; providing the encapsulated information to a simulation process to simulate a lithographic process. 3. Method according to clause 2, with the transformation function includes computing one or more transmission cross coefficients. 4. Method according to clause 2, where the information is secured by the transformation function is unavailable to a user or the simulation process. 5. Method according to clause 2, the one or more optical components include an illumination system, a projection system or both of the lithographic apparatus. 6. Method according to clause 2, including the one or more optical properties include illuminator shape and polarization, Jones pupil, focus blur due to laser bandwidth, focus blur due to chromatic aberrations. 7. Method according to clause 3, where the computed transmission cross coefficients are applied to a source mask simulation process to determine process quality metrics or predicted contours or a mask layout data file. 8. Method according to clause 7, the process quality metrics include one or more or normalized image log slope, mask error factor, and process window. 9. Method for simulating aspects of a lithographic process, including generating a model for simulating the aspects of the lithographic process; embedding information about a variety of aspects of the lithographic process to the model; using the model to transform the information into transformed information with a transformation of which the inverse is indeterminate given the transformed information only; where the model allows receiving the simulated aspects based on the transformed information and further information about other aspects of the lithographic process. 10. Method according to clause 9, including the various of aspects comprises at least one of illuminator shape, illuminator polarization, Jones pupil and focus blur. 11. Method according to clause 9 or 10, the further information comprises information on the layout or a pattern on a patterning means. 12. Method according to any of the clauses 9 to 11, including the simulated aspects include at least one of aerial image intensity, normalized image log slope, mask error factor and process window. 13. Method according to any of the clauses 9 to 12, including the transformed information comprises a variety or eigenvectors and own values of transmission cross coefficients. 14. Method according to any of the clauses 9 to 13, the transformation is independent of the further information.
    权利要求:
    Claims (1)
    [1]
    A lithography device comprising: an exposure device adapted to provide a radiation beam; a carrier constructed to support a patterning device, the patterning device being capable of applying a pattern in a section of the radiation beam to form a patterned radiation beam; a substrate table constructed to support a substrate; and a projection device adapted to project the patterned radiation beam onto a target area of the substrate, characterized in that the substrate table is adapted to position the target area of the substrate in a focal plane of the projection device.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    US9645509B2|2017-05-09|Scanner model representation with transmission cross coefficients
    US10592633B2|2020-03-17|Fast freeform source and mask co-optimization method
    US9390206B2|2016-07-12|Methods and systems for lithography process window simulation
    US9009647B2|2015-04-14|Methods and systems for lithography calibration using a mathematical model for a lithographic process
    JP5180359B2|2013-04-10|Flow of optimization of light source, mask and projection optics
    US8542340B2|2013-09-24|Illumination optimization
    US9360766B2|2016-06-07|Method and system for lithography process-window-maximixing optical proximity correction
    US8120753B2|2012-02-21|Method, program product and apparatus for generating a calibrated pupil kernel and method of using the same in a lithography simulation process
    US9053280B2|2015-06-09|Rule optimization in lithographic imaging based on correlation of functions representing mask and predefined optical conditions
    NL2003719A|2010-05-11|Delta tcc for fast sensitivity model computation.
    US8792147B2|2014-07-29|Method, program product and apparatus for creating optimal test patterns for optical model calibration and for selecting suitable calibration test patterns from an arbitrary layout
    WO2016192964A1|2016-12-08|Simulation of lithography using multiple-sampling of angular distribution of source radiation
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    JP2010113352A|2010-05-20|
    JP5685371B2|2015-03-18|
    US20100141925A1|2010-06-10|
    US9645509B2|2017-05-09|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US5523193A|1988-05-31|1996-06-04|Texas Instruments Incorporated|Method and apparatus for patterning and imaging member|
    EP0527166B1|1990-05-02|1995-06-14|Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Förderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V.|Illumination device|
    US5229872A|1992-01-21|1993-07-20|Hughes Aircraft Company|Exposure device including an electrically aligned electronic mask for micropatterning|
    US6481998B2|1995-06-07|2002-11-19|Ge Energy And Environmental Research Corporation|High velocity reburn fuel injector|
    JP4075966B2|1996-03-06|2008-04-16|エーエスエムエルネザーランズビー．ブイ．|Differential interferometer system and lithographic step-and-scan apparatus comprising this system|
    EP1197801B1|1996-12-24|2005-12-28|ASML Netherlands B.V.|Lithographic device with two object holders|
    US6226751B1|1998-04-17|2001-05-01|Vpnet Technologies, Inc.|Method and apparatus for configuring a virtual private network|
    JP3296316B2|1999-02-22|2002-06-24|日本電気株式会社|Light intensity distribution simulation system and method, and recording medium|
    JP2002132986A|2000-10-18|2002-05-10|Canon Inc|Information-providing method and information-providing system|
    JP4266082B2|2001-04-26|2009-05-20|株式会社東芝|Inspection method for exposure mask pattern|
    US7594199B2|2003-01-14|2009-09-22|Asml Masktools B.V.|Method of optical proximity correction design for contact hole mask|
    JP4731830B2|2003-03-31|2011-07-27|エーエスエムエルマスクツールズビー．ブイ．|Source and mask optimization|
    JP4038501B2|2003-09-02|2008-01-30|株式会社東芝|Inverse model calculation apparatus and inverse model calculation method|
    US7003758B2|2003-10-07|2006-02-21|Brion Technologies, Inc.|System and method for lithography simulation|
    JP4247104B2|2003-12-18|2009-04-02|株式会社東芝|Pattern verification method, pattern verification system|
    JP4528580B2|2004-08-24|2010-08-18|株式会社東芝|Illumination light source design method, mask pattern design method, photomask manufacturing method, semiconductor device manufacturing method, and program|
    US7886155B2|2004-12-20|2011-02-08|Biogy, Inc.|System for generating requests to a passcode protected entity|
    EP1941321A2|2005-09-09|2008-07-09|Brion Technologies, Inc.|System and method for mask verification using an individual mask error model|
    US8644588B2|2006-09-20|2014-02-04|Luminescent Technologies, Inc.|Photo-mask and wafer image reconstruction|
    KR101769258B1|2007-01-18|2017-08-17|가부시키가이샤 니콘|Scanner based optical proximity correction system and method of use|US8103086B2|2007-01-11|2012-01-24|Kla-Tencor Corporation|Reticle defect inspection with model-based thin line approaches|
    US8611637B2|2007-01-11|2013-12-17|Kla-Tencor Corporation|Wafer plane detection of lithographically significant contamination photomask defects|
    KR101769258B1|2007-01-18|2017-08-17|가부시키가이샤 니콘|Scanner based optical proximity correction system and method of use|
    US8136054B2|2009-01-29|2012-03-13|Synopsys, Inc.|Compact abbe's kernel generation using principal component analysis|
    NL2007303A|2010-09-23|2012-03-26|Asml Netherlands Bv|Process tuning with polarization.|
    JP2012099596A|2010-11-01|2012-05-24|Panasonic Corp|Optimization method of lighting shape, optimization method of mask shape, and pattern formation method|
    NL2007642A|2010-11-10|2012-05-14|Asml Netherlands Bv|Optimization flows of source, mask and projection optics.|
    NL2007577A|2010-11-10|2012-05-14|Asml Netherlands Bv|Optimization of source, mask and projection optics.|
    US9127927B2|2011-12-16|2015-09-08|Kla-Tencor Corporation|Techniques for optimized scatterometry|
    CN105301913B|2014-06-06|2017-11-03|台湾积体电路制造股份有限公司|High-resolution photolithography method and structure are carried with the mask of two states|
    US10133184B2|2012-04-25|2018-11-20|Nikon Corporation|Using customized lens pupil optimization to enhance lithographic imaging in a source-mask optimization scheme|
    US9442387B2|2013-02-01|2016-09-13|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.|Extreme ultraviolet lithography process|
    US9442384B2|2013-03-13|2016-09-13|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.|Extreme ultraviolet lithography process and mask|
    US9354212B2|2014-01-07|2016-05-31|Applied Materials Israel Ltd.|Inspection having a segmented pupil|
    US9395622B2|2014-02-20|2016-07-19|Globalfoundries Inc.|Synthesizing low mask error enhancement factor lithography solutions|
    CN106164777B|2014-04-14|2019-06-18|Asml荷兰有限公司|The Optimizing Flow of photoetching process|
    KR102193687B1|2014-09-15|2020-12-21|삼성전자주식회사|OPC method reflecting slit effect and method for fabricating EUV mask and semiconductor device using the OPC method|
    WO2016045901A1|2014-09-22|2016-03-31|Asml Netherlands B.V.|Process window identifier|
    US10394984B2|2015-11-25|2019-08-27|International Business Machines Corporation|Tool to provide integrated circuit masks with accurate dimensional compensation of patterns|
    US10048594B2|2016-02-19|2018-08-14|Tokyo Electron Limited|Photo-sensitized chemically amplified resistmodel calibration|
    US10025177B2|2016-03-16|2018-07-17|Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.|Efficient way to creating process window enhanced photomask layout|
    WO2018228820A1|2017-06-14|2018-12-20|Asml Netherlands B.V.|Lithographic apparatus and method|
    US10867112B2|2018-06-28|2020-12-15|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.|Methods of making mask using transmission cross coefficientmatrix of lithography process optical system|
    US10747119B2|2018-09-28|2020-08-18|Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.|Apparatus and method for monitoring reflectivity of the collector for extreme ultraviolet radiation source|
    US10656528B1|2018-10-05|2020-05-19|Synopsys, Inc.|Lithographic mask functions to model the incident angles of a partially coherent illumination|
    WO2021043596A1|2019-09-03|2021-03-11|Asml Netherlands B.V.|Method for determining aberration sensitivity of patterns|
    法律状态:
    2011-01-05| WDAP| Patent application withdrawn|Effective date: 20100824 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    US11291308P| true| 2008-11-10|2008-11-10|
    US11291308|2008-11-10|
    [返回顶部]